Sunday, February 20, 2011

"Good Behavior"???

      What classifies “good behavior”? That seemed to be a reoccurring theme throughout this week’s readings, and one that I have given a lot of thought too. I’m not going to lie, even though I like this idea of a writer’s workshop, it scares me too because it requires the teacher to hand some of her control over to her students. I’m all about student choice, and I think that students should be able to talk and work and socialize at the same time but this writer’s workshop gives a “slightly out-of-hand feeling” as the book described. I think it is super hard for teachers to let go of that control because of the fear of what would ensue. I think if we gave students more control over what went on during their writing times (or any other time) they might actually get used to it, so the “slightly out-of-hand feeling” might go away because the students are used to having the control and they know what they have to do in order to get what they have to get done, done. It’s a hard balance to find I believe, but definitely one worth finding for sure. The book discusses how the nature of writing should not feel super controlled all the time (which is one reason those writing workshop kits do not work). I have never thought about this before, but it is so true. When I was forced to write in elementary/middle/high school and I had to be working on a very specific part of a particular piece (i.e., making a rough draft, or “brainstorming” or revising, etc…) I feel so unmotivated. The point of writing is to enjoy it, write what you feel, be proud of what you write, don’t be proud of what you write, do whatever you want to with your writing (within reason I suppose). Writing is a journey and our student’s should experience the best parts (and the worst parts) of that journey. The point is, is that they are experiencing it, which is more than I can say for my writing experiences in the pasts. Students just can’t experience writing in a positive way if they are being controlled all the time with their writing. They won’t want to write anymore. We want them to write.
      A final and second main point that struck me in with this week’s readings was the difference in the teacher’s role in a writer’s workshop as the book describes and a writer’s workshop that many of us have experienced growing up. The book states it this way, “…we don’t ever want to think of students’ independent work time as a time for us to work on other things that need doing. We need to be out there teaching, for one thing, and for another, if they sense that this is a time when we “let me loose,” we will have problems. Letting them choose their work doesn’t mean letting them loose” (p. 74).  I got too main points out of this statement: (1) “we don’t ever want to think of students’ independent work time as a time for us to work on other things that need doing.” Ok, now, I get it. Teacher’s have a ton to do throughout the day, a lot of which is “behind the scenes” type of stuff. I also get that teacher’s do not want to take their work home with them (honestly, who does????). BUT! I have read on countless occasions that when the students are doing something independently, like independent reading or writing, the teacher should be doing that as well or, at least, helping other students with these specific things during this time. Think about it. When students are working on math problems, I have rarely seen a teacher go up, teach a lesson, then go back down and sit down at their desk without ever interacting with the students. I usually see them answering questions, helping students understand a concept, and making sure students get it. Why should reading and writing be any different? Are these not subjects too that require and deserve a teacher’s respect so students will respect it too?  I have also read that it is hard for students to learn to appreciate things like writing or reading if they never see their teacher’s doing it, which makes sense. If the teacher does not have to do it, why does the student? Makes sense a little bit. Student’s should see their teachers work. They should see that their teacher has written pieces or is currently writing pieces or has struggled with pieces just like the student. I think it would let the students see the more “human” side of the teacher, as well as, appreciate what they are doing more because they see that their teacher has done it and experienced it too. I cannot tell you how many times I had a “writing workshop” in my younger schooling where the teacher has given us a topic and a form to write in, said “Write.”, then went and sat back down to start grading papers or what not. I understand completely that having this independent time cuts down on the work load at home (let’s face it, we have our own, private lives to take care of at home too), but the students need us. They need us to be interactive with them. They need to see that we have experienced what they are experiencing. It will make them appreciate this art a whole lot more.
      The second and final main thing I got out of the above statement was “Letting them choose their work does not mean letting them loose.” A lot of this goes back to my first paragraph, so I’ll cut this one a little short. Basically, I think student choose in writing is a great idea. Growing up, I hated student choice because it was so hard for me to think of something to write about. But, I also rarely got student choice in writing. So, if we give student’s more choices consistently, they might, eventually, have a whole long list of things they would like to write about. And let’s be honest, the reason why we (as students) acted “loose” was because we never got the chance to be responsible for our own writing. We were never allowed the chance to have that responsibility, so when we got ‘free choice’, we probably acted out of hand. If we give students’ more opportunities to write about what they want or feel, “letting them loose” won’t be a ‘problem’. In fact, we may start hating the fact that we might, occasionally, have to give them a topic to write about.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

facebook

So, I watched The Social Network this weekend.....highly recommeneded! I really liked it. Definitely interesting to see how this whole thing that has a huge impact on people's lives started. Granted it was hollywood portrayl, so there's your grain of salt, but I really really liked it. Kind of let's me view facebook in a new way, I kinda feel bad for the people that got "taken advantage of" while trying to launch the site. But then again, I don't know the real story, but anway, there's my two cents. Have a beautiful day :)

Conferencing

      This week’s readings (Ch. 14, 15, 17) were an interesting read…and a much needed on. When we discuss conferring or conferencing with our students, I am usually concerned with how to go about it because we never actually get to practice it, which is understandable, I don’t think you can really practice what you talk about with your students because you never know what you’re going to talk about, like the book says. One of the main things I got out of this week’s readings was conferring with our students during writer’s workshop. I think conferring is a great idea and, definitely, a much needed one. Often times we aren’t sure about the struggles our students have in writing, we just see the final product. The beauty of a true writer’s workshop is that it allows time for student conferences with the teacher. A teacher can sit down with the student and talk, writer to writer, about the student’s work. This is a time that is really crucial to the teacher because, I think, it allows the teacher to see what her students are struggling with, what they need help with, what they are succeeding at, what they need to move towards. The book says that the purpose of conferencing is not to help the student; it is to teach the student. The book says “we don’t want our students to become dependent on our help to get them out of binds. As writer’s they need to learn that they will encounter difficulties that they have to figure out. (p. 157)” I completely agree, although, I look at teaching and helping as similar aspects, I can see the separation that needs to take place. We don’t want our students to become needy with us. As writers, they need to be able to get out there and figure it out for themselves, they won’t always have someone there to help them work through their problems, but the great thing about conferencing is that we are there to help/teach them if they need us too. If the student has tried to work their issue for themselves and they have asked friends and looked up stuff and they just can’t get it, that is where the teacher comes in as a guide to help them discover new strategies (or whatever the issue is) to teach the student so the student knows what to do next time it happens (or if it happens again).
      I like this whole idea of conferences, it’s a really interesting thing to entertain, I’m just unsure of how to really go about doing it in my classroom because I want to know specifics about the concept. For example, how often are we supposed to give conferences? Do we give them once a week to each student or once every two weeks? I know most of it would depend on your class size but that is an idea that concerns me. Another idea that raises concern to me is the amount of time. Conferences are supposed to be short, and I completely agree with that, but two to seven minutes seems, well, super short. Can we really teach them what we have to teach them in that short amount of time? I’m pretty certain we can, especially when we have had practice at doing it over a period of time, but I suppose I will have concerns with it until I can actually get out there in my own classroom and fiddle around with this conferencing idea for myself.
      Something that I found extremely helpful about conferencing is the questions that will help us, as teachers, make a decision about what to talk about with the student in conferences. These questions are listed on page 165. I think they are great guiding questions to help us narrow down what we need to discuss with our students during conferencing but they aren’t limiting questions either. For example, if you think a student needs help with something at one particular time and you plan a conference time to do it, and you get to that conference time, and the student is more concerned with something else. I think it is perfectly okay to, maybe, abandon your plan for the day and focus on what the student needs right then. That is what they are struggling with and, obviously, it is something that is important to them, and we don’t want to push that aside.
      Another and final thing (for this blog post anyway) I liked about the whole idea of a true writer’s workshop is the idea of sharing time. I think it is important for us to come together as writer’s to share our struggles and successes and plateau’s. The book says, “It’s a value I have about learning communities, and a writing workshop is a learning community. It is a place that I create where we learn together and where we support each other in that learning in important ways. (p.175)” I don’t think I could have put it better myself, we often talk about learning communities in our classes and how important they are. A writer’s workshop is a learning community within a learning community it seems where the student can feel supported in their writing (they should also feel supported in all aspects as well). I think that a writer’s workshop would help student’s feel more comfortable and willing to share outside of the writer’s workshop time, which will allow for a stronger, closer classroom- learning community. I can’t wait to get my hands into conferencing with my students and see what is going on in their writing world. I think it will definitely be interesting to discover.  

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Shape Creation: Elements of a Writer's Workshop 


Essentials of a Focus Lesson